top of page
BRANDi Logo (No R and SM).png
BRANDi website elements png-03_edited_ed
Search

How to Invest Wisely: When Climate Actions Do Not Have to Cannibalize Poverty Eradication

ree

For years, a persistent myth has haunted climate discourse: that lifting billions out of poverty would derail global climate goals due to how many resources such an effort would siphon away from climate solutions. Yet the World Bank’s Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet 2024 report offers a powerful rebuttal. The bank analyzes historical emissions patterns and finds that raising global incomes to $6.85/day would increase emissions by 46% (2019 figures); however, if countries instead adopt top-tier practices in renewable energy and energy efficiency, that projected rise in emissions could be slashed by more than half. In short, we do not have to choose between eradicating poverty and protecting the planet; we simply need to invest wisely.


THE CASE FOR RENEWABLES+SOCIAL ACTIONS

Data from the World Bank shows that across emerging markets, renewables are now often the lowest-cost option, especially in regions underserved by fossil fuel infrastructure in Africa and Asia Pacific. Solar and wind energy are particularly effective at connecting remote or sparsely populated areas to electricity, bringing not just light but opportunity to low-income communities. The implication from this is clear: poverty reduction can go together with climate actions. This is especially true for nations such as Uzbekistan and Côte d’Ivoire, where gas supplies are diminishing and electricity demand is soaring. Both are finding that transitioning to renewables has become the most cost-efficient choice to bring power (and, thus, uplifting the standard of living) to the people. More than $50 million in combined government budgets allocated for community development was saved in these two states.


THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF DUAL INVESTMENTS

Beyond lowering emissions, these green investments improve energy security, reduce long-term costs, and boost local job creation. However, for low-income countries, the upfront capital for renewable infrastructure and grid modernization remains a major barrier. This is where international climate finance becomes indispensable. Without concessional financing and targeted support, less developed countries risk locking into high-carbon development paths, which will be more expensive to unwind later and fail to deliver inclusive growth. Prioritizing climate-smart infrastructure now can avoid stranded assets and ensure a just energy transition.


For middle-income countries, the lesson is clear. Growth must be both inclusive and low-carbon. By combining energy efficiency mandates with renewables rollout and ensuring that poor households are protected through targeted subsidies or rebates, the country can simultaneously reduce emissions, lower inequality, and future-proof its energy economy. Climate and development goals do not need to compete, for with the right policy alignment and financial architecture, they can reinforce one another.


 
 
 

Comments


Don't worry, we don't like spam either.

You can unsubscribe at any time.

Don't worry, we don't like spam either.

You can unsubscribe at any time.

bottom of page