top of page
Search

Environmental Progress: Claims v. Actions


As the impacts of climate change and resource depletion become more evident, companies and governments have made claims about their commitment to environmental progress. However, it is important to recognize that tangible actions back these up. Without concrete measures, such claims are nothing more than greenwashing—a superficial attempt to present an entity as environmentally friendly without any real substance. Enter Bintan Industrial Park: a planned “green” complex in the Riau archipelago. Though the project—to be powered by hydroelectricity and used mainly to produce EV batteries—is being hailed as Indonesia’s major environmental breakthrough, a closer examination reveals the gap between “actions” and “claims.”


WHAT WENT DOWN IN BINTAN?

According to an article published by Mongabay news, the industrial park will be built on land previously used for small-scale farming and aquaculture. This land was not only a source of livelihood for local communities, but it also played a critical role in maintaining the region's ecological balance. The park's construction would displace these communities and lead to the destruction of vital ecosystems, including mangrove forests and coral reefs.

In addition to the negative impacts on the local environment, the industrial park is also likely to have negative consequences for the global climate. The battery companies that will be located in the park are expected to produce a significant amount of greenhouse gases from the processing of nickel, a crucial element in batteries. Furthermore, large parts of the park's infrastructure, such as logistics and waste management, will still be powered by fossil fuels rather than renewable energy sources, further exacerbating the problem of carbon emissions.


ORGANIZATIONS MUST COMMIT TO TANGIBLE ACTIONS

To deliver on the promise they make, businesses and governments must ensure that their actions can result in concrete environmental outcomes. The Environmental Protection Agency states that one way to do this is by setting specific and measurable goals for their efforts. Such objectives include reducing greenhouse gas emissions, conserving water and energy, or implementing recycling programs. It is also crucial for companies and policymakers alike to be transparent about their environmental practices and regularly report on their progress toward their sustainability goals. This helps to build trust with stakeholders and ensures that their efforts are genuine rather than just a marketing tactic. To avoid greenwashing, seeking out third-party certification for environmental initiatives, such as LEED certification for buildings or Fair Trade certification for products, is essential. This action can provide an independent assessment of an organization's environmental impact and ensure that its sustainability efforts are credible and compelling.

Any claims of environmental progress must be backed up with real actions that genuinely address the problem of climate change and protect the environment. This case study must remind the public and private sectors alike that tangible actions are always the way to go. In fact, when concrete changes are made, they can show themselves to the world without needing any publicity effort.



Priding ourselves on sharing GREAT insights to society, we will continue to publish FREE content for ALL readers to uplift their knowledge and go from Good to GREAT!

Comments


Don't worry, we don't like spam either.

You can unsubscribe at any time.

Don't worry, we don't like spam either.

You can unsubscribe at any time.

bottom of page